Month: May 2025
-
Epic v. Apple: Apple Seeks Emergency Stay of App Store Contempt Order
In its latest battle with Epic Games, Apple has sought emergency relief from the Ninth Circuit to stay a contempt order issued by Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers on April 30, 2025. The district court held Apple in civil contempt for violating a 2021 permanent injunction and imposed additional permanent restrictions on Apple’s App Store conduct.…
-
Ingenico Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC: Public Availability of Prior Art Software Invalidates Patent Claims
In a recent decision, Ingenico Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC, the Federal Circuit upheld a jury’s finding that several claims of IOENGINE’s U.S. Patent Nos. 9,059,969 and 9,774,703 were invalid due to anticipation and obviousness by publicly available prior art. Specifically, the Court affirmed that a software application known as the “Firmware Upgrader,” part of M-Systems’…
-
Epic Games v. Apple: Apple Held in Contempt Over App Store Anti-Steering Injunction
On April 30, 2025, U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that Apple violated the court’s prior injunction concerning anti-steering provisions in its App Store policies. This latest ruling is a significant development in the high-profile legal battle between Epic Games and Apple, carrying substantial implications for the broader technology industry. Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers…
-
Incyte Corp. v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries: Federal Circuit Reinforces Strict Article III Standing Requirements for Patent Challengers
In a recent decision, Incyte Corporation v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries, Inc., the Federal Circuit reaffirmed the stringent standards for establishing Article III standing in appeals from PTAB decisions. The court dismissed Incyte’s appeal from a PTAB post-grant review proceeding, holding that Incyte failed to demonstrate a sufficient injury in fact required for Article III standing.…
-
In re Kostic: Broadened Reissue Claims Rejected Due to Statutory Bar
In In re Kostic, the Federal Circuit recently reinforced the statutory bar against broadening reissue applications filed beyond the two-year limit, emphasizing that claims must be construed based on their actual language rather than an inventor’s subjective intent. Background:Appellants Kostic and Vandevelde sought reissue of U.S. Patent No. 8,494,950, covering methods for buying and selling…