-
ParkerVision v. Qualcomm: Collateral Estoppel and Expert Exclusion in Patent Litigation
After more than a decade of litigation between ParkerVision and Qualcomm, the Federal Circuit has vacated summary judgment of non-infringement and reversed key Daubert rulings that had hobbled…
4 min read
-
Osseo Imaging v. Planmeca: Rejection of Temporal Limitation on Expert Qualifications
In its September 2024 decision in Osseo Imaging, LLC v. Planmeca USA Inc., the Federal Circuit reaffirmed the standard for expert qualifications in patent cases, declining to impose…
4 min read
-
Broadband iTV v. Amazon: CAFC Doubles Down on § 101 Ineligibility
In its recent decision Broadband iTV, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., the Federal Circuit affirmed a summary judgment ruling that all asserted claims from five patents were directed to…
4 min read
-
WARF v. Apple: A Cautionary Tale of Waiver and Preclusion
In its August 28, 2024 opinion in Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation v. Apple Inc., the Federal Circuit issued a decisive ruling affirming two final judgments in favor of…
4 min read
-
Realtime Adaptive Streaming LLC v. Sling TV: “Red Flags” in § 285 Fee Awards
In a significant opinion issued on August 23, 2024, the Federal Circuit vacated a district court’s award of attorneys’ fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 in Realtime Adaptive…
4 min read
-
Platinum Optics v. Viavi: Dismissal of Appeal for Lack of Standing Despite Prior Infringement Disputes
In Platinum Optics Technology Inc. v. Viavi Solutions Inc., No. 23-1227 (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2024), the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal from an inter partes review (IPR)…
4 min read
