Technology Information Law Blog by Charles Gideon Korrell

Blog Posts

Global Tubing v. Tenaris: “Smoking Gun” Isn’t Enough for Summary Judgment on Inequitable Conduct or Walker Process Fraud

Global Tubing v. Tenaris: “Smoking Gun” Isn’t Enough for Summary Judgment on Inequitable Conduct or Walker Process Fraud

Bygideon.korrell Patent Law February 27, 2026 antitrust,CAFC,fraud,inequitable conduct,patent law (0)

REGENXBIO v. Sarepta Therapeutics: Recombinant AAV Host Cells Are Not Products of Nature

REGENXBIO v. Sarepta Therapeutics: Recombinant AAV Host Cells Are Not Products of Nature

Bygideon.korrell Patent Law February 22, 2026 CAFC,elegibility,patent law (0)

Learning Resources v. Trump: The Supreme Court Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize Tariffs

Learning Resources v. Trump: The Supreme Court Rules IEEPA Does Not Authorize Tariffs

Bygideon.korrell International Trade February 21, 2026 international trade,SCOTUS (0)

Genuine Enabling Tech. v. Sony: Means-Plus-Function Claims Demand Full Structural Accounting

Genuine Enabling Tech. v. Sony: Means-Plus-Function Claims Demand Full Structural Accounting

Bygideon.korrell Patent Law February 20, 2026 CAFC,means-plus-function,patent law (0)

Netflix v. DivX: Federal Circuit Reaffirms the Rule of the Last Antecedent in Claim Construction

Bygideon.korrell Patent Law February 14, 2026 CAFC,claim construction,IPR,patent law (0)

Apple v. Squires: Federal Circuit Holds NHK-Fintiv Is a General Statement of Policy Exempt from APA Notice-and-Comment

Apple v. Squires: Federal Circuit Holds NHK-Fintiv Is a General Statement of Policy Exempt from APA Notice-and-Comment

Bygideon.korrell Patent Law February 14, 2026 CAFC,IPR,patent law (0)

Ingevity v. BASF: Federal Circuit Affirms $84.8M Antitrust Verdict for Patent-Based Tying of Staple Goods

Bygideon.korrell Anticompetition,Patent Law February 11, 2026 antitrust,CAFC,licensing,misuse,patent law,tying (0)

GoTV v. Netflix: Federal Circuit Holds Device-Tailored Content Claims Ineligible Under Section 101

Bygideon.korrell Patent Law February 10, 2026 CAFC,elegibility,patent law (0)

Range of Motion Prods v. Armaid: Narrow Design Patent Scope and the Growing Role of “Plainly Dissimilar”

Range of Motion Prods v. Armaid: Narrow Design Patent Scope and the Growing Role of “Plainly Dissimilar”

Bygideon.korrell Patent Law February 2, 2026 CAFC,claim construction,design patent,functionality (0)