Tag: ITC
-
Bissell v. ITC: Firmware Redesign Defeats ITC Exclusion Order
When patent owners prevail in Section 337 investigations before the International Trade Commission, the resulting exclusion orders can be commercially devastating. But sophisticated respondents increasingly prepare redesign strategies while the investigation is still pending, particularly where the accused functionality is controlled through firmware or software logic. The Federal Circuit’s decision in Bissell, Inc. v. International…
-
Ascendis v. BioMarin: Federal Circuit Rejects Procedural Reset of Section 1659 Stay Deadline
There is a quiet but persistent tension in patent litigation involving the ITC: the statute promises efficiency, but the structure invites gamesmanship. Section 1659 is supposed to prevent duplicative litigation by forcing district courts to stand down when the same issues are being litigated at the ITC. But that protection is not automatic—it must be…
-
Apple v. ITC: Federal Circuit Holds Prototypes Can Establish a Section 337 Domestic Industry
The Federal Circuit’s decision in Apple Inc. v. International Trade Commission , Case No. 2024-1285 (Fed. Cir., Mar. 19, 2026), delivers a clear and practical message: a domestic industry under Section 337 does not require a finished commercial product. Iterative prototypes—supported by testing, engineering records, and witness testimony—can be enough. That holding represents a meaningful…
-
Crocs v. ITC: One Commission Decision Can Trigger Two Appeal Deadlines
The Federal Circuit’s decision in Crocs, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, Case No. 2024-1300 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 8, 2026), illustrates a jurisdictional trap in Section 337 proceedings: different portions of the same Commission determination can become final, and therefore appealable, at different times. The court dismissed as untimely Crocs’s challenge to a no-violation determination while…
-
V.O.S. Selections (Learning Resources) v. Trump at the Supreme Court: Verbs, Taxes, and an Exit Ramp
The Supreme Court argument in the tariff cases presented the Justices with a familiar but high-stakes question: how far an old statute can be stretched to support a novel assertion of executive power. The Federal Circuit had already answered the core statutory question en banc, holding that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does…
-
Brita v. ITC: Functional Genus Claims Fail Written Description and Enablement
The Federal Circuit’s October 15, 2025 decision in Brita LP v. International Trade Commission delivers a clear warning to patentees who rely on broad, functionally defined genus claims without commensurate disclosure. Affirming the ITC, the court held that claims covering any gravity-fed water filter media achieving a particular performance metric failed both the written description…
-
Causam v. ITC: Standing Secured, But the Case Still Slips Away
On October 15, 2025, the Federal Circuit issued a decision in Causam Enterprises, Inc. v. International Trade Commission, No. 23-1769, that delivers a curious combination of vindication and defeat. On the one hand, the court held that Causam did, in fact, own the asserted patent and therefore satisfied Article III standing to pursue its appeal.…
-
V.O.S. Selections v. Trump: En Banc Federal Circuit Rejects IEEPA Tariff Authority
The Federal Circuit’s recent en banc decision in V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. United States addressing challenges to former President Trump’s sweeping tariff regime represents one of the most consequential trade-law rulings in decades. Sitting en banc, the court affirmed the core constitutional holding that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not authorize the…
-
Realtek v. ITC: Federal Circuit Lacks Jurisdiction Over Section 337(h) Sanctions Appeal
In Realtek Semiconductor Corporation v. International Trade Commission, No. 23-1187 (Fed. Cir. June 18, 2025), the Federal Circuit dismissed Realtek’s appeal for lack of jurisdiction, holding that a denied sanctions request under Section 337(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930 is not reviewable by the Federal Circuit when it is not tied to a final…
-
V.O.S. Selections v. United States: CIT Rejects Presidential Tariffs Under IEEPA
On May 28, 2025, the U.S. Court of International Trade issued a major decision in V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. United States, holding that President Trump’s sweeping tariffs—imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)—exceeded the limits of executive authority and violated the Constitution. The ruling vacates the tariffs and enjoins their enforcement, bringing them…