The Technology & Information Law Blog

Analysis by Charles Gideon Korrell

  • Federal Circuit Reverses JMOL in Steuben Foods Patent Case: Key Takeaways for IP Law

    ·

    In Steuben Foods, Inc. v. Shibuya Hoppmann Corporation, the Federal Circuit issued a major decision addressing key intellectual property issues related to patent infringement, claim construction, and the reverse doctrine of equivalents (RDOE). The case centered on aseptic food packaging technology, with the court analyzing whether Shibuya’s P7 aseptic bottling line infringed Steuben’s patents. This…

    Continue reading →


  • Lynk Labs v. Samsung: Federal Circuit Clarifies Prior Art Status of Published Patent Applications in IPRs

    ·

    On January 14, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a pivotal decision in Lynk Labs, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., affirming the invalidation of certain claims in Lynk Labs’ U.S. Patent No. 10,687,400 (the ’400 patent) through inter partes review (IPR). The case primarily addressed a critical question…

    Continue reading →


  • BEARBOX LLC v. LANCIUM LLC: A Legal Examination of Inventorship and State Law Preemption in Patent Law

    ·

    In the recent case of BearBox LLC v. Lancium LLC, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addressed pivotal issues concerning inventorship claims and the preemption of state law by federal patent statutes. This case underscores the intricate balance between state and federal jurisdictions in intellectual property disputes. Case Background Austin Storms,…

    Continue reading →


  • Federal Circuit Reverses Invalidity Finding for Novartis’ Entresto Patent

    ·

    On January 10, 2025, the Federal Circuit issued a significant decision in In re Entresto (Sacubitril/Valsartan) Patent Litigation, reversing a district court ruling that had found claims of Novartis’ U.S. Patent 8,101,659 (“the ’659 patent”) invalid for lack of written description. The appellate court affirmed the district court’s rulings that the patent was not invalid…

    Continue reading →


  • Court Upholds Limited Damages in Bitmanagement Software GmbH v. United States: Key Takeaways on Copyright Infringement and Licensing

    ·

    On January 7, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its decision in Bitmanagement Software GmbH v. United States, affirming a damages award of $154,400 for copyright infringement by the U.S. Navy. The case centered around the Navy’s unauthorized copying and use of Bitmanagement’s 3D rendering software, BS Contact Geo,…

    Continue reading →


  • Federal Circuit Ruling on Oman Fasteners: A Critical Look at Antidumping Duties and Administrative Review Standards

    ·

    On January 7, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued an important ruling in Oman Fasteners, LLC v. United States, a case that highlights key issues in international trade law, including antidumping duties, administrative review procedures, and the application of adverse inferences under 19 U.S.C. § 1677e. The decision sheds light…

    Continue reading →


  • Functionality and Trademark Law: The Federal Circuit’s Decision in CeramTec GmbH v. CoorsTek Bioceramics LLC

    ·

    In a significant ruling on the intersection of patent and trademark law, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently upheld the cancellation of CeramTec GmbH’s trademarks for the pink color of ceramic hip components. The court affirmed the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), finding that the color pink…

    Continue reading →


  • Federal Circuit Overturns PTAB Decision in Honeywell v. 3G Licensing: A Victory for Obviousness Challenges

    ·

    On January 2, 2025, the Federal Circuit issued a significant ruling in Honeywell International Inc. v. 3G Licensing, S.A., reversing the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) decision that upheld the validity of U.S. Patent No. 7,319,718. This ruling underscores the court’s approach to obviousness under 35 U.S.C. § 103 and highlights critical considerations in…

    Continue reading →


  • Federal Circuit Reverses Infringement Verdict in CloudofChange v. NCR: A Case Study in Divided Infringement and System Claims

    ·

    On December 18, 2024, the Federal Circuit issued a significant opinion in CloudofChange, LLC v. NCR Corporation, a case concerning direct infringement of system claims under 35 U.S.C. § 271(a). The decision clarifies the application of Centillion Data Systems, LLC v. Qwest Communications International, Inc. and Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc., two pivotal…

    Continue reading →


  • Federal Circuit Vacates and Remands in Meyer Corporation Case: Key Patent Law Takeaways

    ·

    The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Meyer Corporation, U.S. v. United States sheds light on several significant issues in customs law and the valuation of imported goods, with broader implications for how courts interpret evidentiary burdens and transaction pricing in a related-party context. While the case primarily involved tariff assessments rather than patent law, it…

    Continue reading →


Archives

Popular Tags